Jordan
Harper
Ancient
Greek Philosophy: Plato
May
2, 2016
Final
Research Paper
The true value of perfection
“If you strive to be good, you will
be poor; if you strive to be great, you will be good; if you strive to be
excellent, you will be great; and if you strive to be perfect, you will be
excellent” (author unknown). Perfection is a constant theme when discussing
“Plato’s Republic”; whether or not it is achievable or maybe just an abstract
concept. One of the more commonly accepted understandings of perfection is that
perfection is not achievable but instead is something that you should try to
strive for but never actually reach; this is appealing because although
perfection can never be reached, on the way to trying to reach it improvement
can be had, much like how the quote at the beginning describes. Aristotle
describes perfection as completion or when a goal is reached; you obtain
fulfillment, “Aristotle speaks of the perfect as the lack-nothing, the
fulfilled, the complete, what has reached its goal, teleios: ‘Things are complete in virtue of having attained their
end….And excellence is completion; for each thing is complete and every
substance is complete, when in respect of its proper kind of excellence it
lacks no part of its natural magnitude’” (Tsanoff 25). This goes along with the
idea that by trying to reach the goal of perfection, the reward will be that
you reach excellence. Plato seems to have a fascination with the various ideas
of perfection and presents numerous images of these ideas in his republic; where
the argument can even be made that the entire book is all one big image of
perfection. With the concept of perfection clearly an important topic, the
question must be asked, what is the true value or reason for perfection or
images of perfection? As stated above, I understand that striving for
perfection to reach your best version of yourself is important, but Plato seems
to go above simply striving to be the best he can be and actually creates
images that by many measures are perfect. An obvious example of these detailed,
perfect images are the three waves to create a perfect city presented in Book 5
of the republic. As humans we are fascinated with the concept of perfection as
this theme has been prevalent in artwork, films, and other sources throughout
history, yet we cannot actually know what perfection would look like since it
is unattainable. In the rest of this paper I will be looking at how Plato uses
his three waves for a perfect city image to create something of value, and
ultimately say what I believe to be the importance and value of these
impossible images of perfection; I will state now that some may find my
conclusion rather polarizing.
The model of a community that Plato
proposes in Book 5 is a very unique creation. I will not discuss the individual
waves in detail, but I will describe each one and then analyze the community
that they form together. The first wave is Plato says women and men should be
educated together, “If, then, we use the women for the same things as the men,
they must also be taught the same things…Then these two arts (music and
gymnastics), and what has to do with war must be assigned to the women also,
and they must be used in the same ways” (5.451e-452a). The second wave is that
there will be no families as we know them, instead the whole community will be
a family and the children will belong to everyone, “And the children, in their
turn, will be in common, and neither will a parent know his own offspring, nor
a child his parent” (5.457d). The third and final wave is that the community
should be ruled by a philosopher king, “the philosophers rule as kings or those
now called kings and chiefs genuinely and adequately philosophize, and political
power and philosophy coincide in the same place” (5.473c-d). Each one of this
waves could fuel a research paper on their own, but I want to focus on the
picture that they create when combined together.
The ultimate goal for Plato is to
structure a city that focusses on and emphasizes the qualities of the community
that he believes to be the most important; this community is his version of a
perfect image. Plato was a man who had dedicated his entire life to his city,
his loyalty was for his community only. It only makes since that his ideal
community would be restructured in such a way that individuals would have their
loyalties shifted from their families to the city as a whole. Plato realized
that no matter how a much a person was dedicated to their city and their
people, the one thing that always has the potential to make a that same person
to not act in the best interest of their community is their love for their
family. Kingdoms have been destroyed because of this superior loyalty to
family. Plato sees the only way to fix the problem of family by changing how woman
and children fit into the society, ultimately make the entire city one big
family so that when someone acts in the best interest of their family it is the
same as acting for their community. When discussing Plato’s idea for a city
using the three waves, most people I have encountered have the opinion that
this city is a version of a perfect city, but ultimately they think the three
waves are too extreme and too many things are lost for this to be a good model;
I disagree on this point. I actually believe this city is not only a good model
for a perfect society, but is also a model we could learn a lot from. I am not
saying that this model of the city will ever actually be created in reality,
but I do believe that, much like communism, when certain variables are hold
constant this model works and sounds amazing on paper. Things that are lost such
as the love of wives and children only seem important to us because our current
community says they are important; if we lived in Plato’s community we would
not think that loyalty and love to individuals would be a good thing. Many
people could not imagine giving up the idea of having a family you care about,
but if you can look the proposal objectively it becomes apparent that many
problems could be avoided if the problems of a personal family were eliminated.
There are many elements in this plan that
are reminiscent of the ancient Spartan society. While husbands and wives were
still present, their role in the city was greatly reduced compared to what we
are used to. Boys were taken away at the age of seven to be trained as a
soldier for twenty-three years where the military became their real family, and
the girls were also trained physically and taught to be dedicated to the state
(Life). The previously mentioned goal of Plato to turn the citizens’ loyalty
and love to the city and not their individual families is one of the most
important elements taken from the Spartan model, “Spartan communism in meals
and sleeping arrangements for adult males deprived private homes of their titular
heads, presumably so that the men would put the public good ahead of their narrow
family interests” (Ludwig 212). Although Spartan men were allowed to marry
before the age of thirty, they would not be allowed to stay the night with
their wife or really create any meaningful connections during this time of
training. Instead, for those twenty-three years, they eat, slept, and blead
with their military “brothers.” This group became a Spartan’s new family, and
because an army is part of the state, by extent the state itself became their
family and possessed their real loyalty. While not every aspect of Sparta was
adopted by Plato, it is clear that he drew heavily from Sparta’s influence. The
fact that a society that was as powerful and successful as Sparta used many of
the same elements that Plato used in his model of the city, helps to give more
understanding as to why Plato chose certain characteristics. Plato proposed a
model that attempted to fix the problem that is the human element, and he
actually came up with a great theory to do just that.
Now all of that may have seemed like a
long, drawn out explanation of what Plato was trying to accomplish with his
three waves, why I believe it could actually work in theory, and even more
importantly what does all of that have to do with finding out the true value
within an image of perfection? Before I begin to address the hypothetical
nature that is inherent whenever discussing the idea of perfection, I needed
you to have a clear understanding of what Plato was trying to create.
Perfection does not exist and so anytime individuals try to create something
that is perfect it is a hypothetical construct that is their ideal version of
perfection. So in a sense each person’s idea of a perfect world would be
different. Plato says himself that he is not discussing these ideas in order to
prove that that could actually work in reality, “We were not seeking them for
the sake of proving that it’s possible for these things to come into being”
(5.472d). This one passage hits on one of the biggest problems that I have
always had with the concept of philosophy, what is the point of going to great
lengths to address hypothetical ideals if there is absolutely no chance of
these ideals being implemented in real life, why do they matter? In all of my
classes and readings on the topic of philosophy no passage has helped me to
understand as much as when Plato follows up his confession that he is not
discussing his three waves for them to be real, “Do you suppose a painter is
any less good who draws a pattern of what the fairest human being would be like
and renders everything in the picture adequately, but can’t prove that it’s
also possible that such a man come into being?” (5.472d). I am not a
particularly strong lover of art, but I can appreciate that something is
beautiful and I know that there are people who can learn a great deal from
admiring a piece of art that has been deemed perfect. In the same manner Plato
is trying get the point across that even though this city will never exist,
that should not take away from the value of the idea, much like a work of art,
“Then, what about this? Weren’t we, as we assert, also making a pattern in
speech of a good city?...Do you suppose that what we say is any less good on
account of our not being able to prove it is possible to found a city the same
as the one in speech?” (5.472d-e). Plato is an artist who uses not a brush but
his mind, and he is able to create amazing works of art and art has value.
There is one big issue related to the idea
of striving for perfection that I have not touched upon, and I feel it must be
addressed in order to give a full and accurate account of the value of
perfection. Like every concept in the world, striving for perfection has
positive theories and negative ones. While this paper so far has focused with
the side I agree with, that striving for perfection is the best possible way to
live your life, the other side of the argument also has merits and it would be unfair
to ignore them. This side says that striving for perfection and not achieving
it is worse than not even trying to begin with. What if someone is trying to
change something to be perfect, but their image is different than everyone else’s
in the world? In theory this means that by trying to change the way something
works to conform to their individual image of perfection, a person could make
things so much worse than they were before. Because perfection is not
attainable, we know that whatever someone choices to strive for will never be
fully achieved so the possibility that the final result could be terrible is a possibility.
This idea seems loosely related to the phrase by Voltaire “The perfect is the
enemy of the good,” which basically means that trying to be just good and not
perfect is the best option because if perfection is the goal, people will stop
trying to do the important task because perfection is an impossible end goal,
but if the goal is simply to be good a person will be more willing to attempt
task because they are able to accept a few mistakes. In the end I simply
believe the idea of striving for perfection is entirely up to the point of view
of the individual, and not some random old philosopher telling you how to
think. I have presented this paper to show how I believe the idea of perfection
should be applied in your life, but by no means is this the definitive
solution. If you agree with the quote that began this paper, then you will most
likely agree with the idea of striving for perfection to reach excellence;
however, if you agree with the idea that striving for something that is unattainable
and achieving something worse, then you will most likely agree with the side
that says striving for perfection is a bad way to live your life. Ultimately we
must remember that perfection is an abstract concept and is purely a tool to
help focus our thoughts and views, and so facts and conclusions about perfection
cannot be drawn.
This has all been one big analysis of only
one particular example of an image of perfection and all the different parts
that make it up; now for the true value in all of this. Plato says, “So, next,
as it seems, we must try to seek out and demonstrate what is badly done in
cities today, and thereby keeps them from being governed in this way, and what
with smallest change—preferably one, two, if not, the fewest in number and the
smallest in power—a city would come to this manner of regime” (5.473b). I
believe Plato is using this model of a perfect city, not to actually create it,
but instead to show the weaknesses of models in use currently. A quick example
is that by pointing out how to fix the problem of split loyalties between
family and city, it is easy to see that this issue does exist. I think this
idea could be applied to the entire republic; Plato is presenting a model of a
perfect soul not to teach people how to be perfect, but to show them were they
are weak. Taking this a step farther, you could apply this idea to all images
of perfection; because we do not have any idea of what actual perfection would
look like, in order to attempt to show it the parts of something that are
deemed bad by society are improved upon as much as possible and displayed on
the only medium which sustains hypothetical concepts, art. We should take the
lessons that we learn from seeing our flaws transformed into something
beautiful as an opportunity to strive to reach the best version of ourselves.
“If you strive to be perfect, you will be excellent.”
When I said in the beginning that my
conclusion could be polarizing, it was because not many will make the claim
that creating an image of perfection has nothing to do with reaching that idea
of perfection, but has everything to do with exposing the flaws that actually
exist in the world whether it be flaws in a government or flaws in a
personality. By exposing these flaws, an individual will be given a real chance
to improve upon them, because how can you improve if you do not know something
is wrong. The idea of a utopia or perfect society keeps popping up in recent entertainment,
and I can only hope that people are able to see the flaws exposed in these
models and learn from them.
Works cited
1. “Life
in Sparta." Sparta.net. N.p., n.d. Web. 03 May 2016.
2. Ludwig,
Paul W. "Eros in the Republic."
The Cambridge Companion to Plato's Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2007.
202-231. Print.
3. Plato,
and Allan Bloom. The Republic of Plato. New York: Basic, 1991. Print.
4. Tsanoff,
Radoslav A. "The Notion of Perfection." The Philosophical Review 49.1
(1940): 25-36. JSTOR. Web. 02 May 2016.
5. Yunis,
Harvey. "The Protreptic Rhetoric of the Republic." The Cambridge
Companion to Plato's Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2007. 1-26. Print.
***Unless
otherwise noted, all quotes come from Plato’s Republic***
No comments:
Post a Comment